CENSUS AND FEES AT IU:
THREE LIES AND A TRUTH ON
THREE LIES AND A TRUTH ON
(I) The census and the Trojans
At the expense of not know what steps the Commission Unitary IU (the pot of consensus "), has completed its work and censuses IU approved in all associations ... begin discussions in September and elections of delegates to the Ninth Federal Assembly and precisely these surveys will determine the correlation of forces in the territories and between the different currents, parties and sensitivities.
In any democratic process, the census is one of the pillars for the realization of , they can only vote who are in the census. So the guarantee of democracy requires, together with the role of government to materialize, at least two conditions: One, that are public, they are published, which are visible to all, and especially, expressed copies, representatives of applications are presented and even the controllers that ensure the cleanliness of the vote. Another, which has neutral bodies, boards of elections, pluralistic, with authority to resolve conflicts that might arise. right to know, to be rectified to complain, to challenge. Transparency and neutrality.
We followed the approval process at IU census, more democratic force State, and have received singularities, contradictions, and also a reasonable doubt elements that make us skeptical, very skeptical about the veracity of this process and its outcome: made clear, we have very serious doubts about the authenticity of census or the census, approved.
First, be clear, the other parliamentary parties arc likely to have censuses, we will not hesitate, but what we have perceived in their respective congressional processes are many elections by acclamation, many candidates and only a "representation" over to the gallery media that internal democracy ...
But the issue of IU census has been postponed as a commitment unresolved processes emerging in congressional and no one satisfied. In fact, the process of "clarification" of surveys have been requested and resulted from the widespread distrust them. The suspect stated again and again, has been confirmed: censuses were inflated. In fact, in the last Federal Assembly was based on more than 78,000 members in the primaries for the presidential candidate of the Government of 60,000 members, and current data are from just over 48,000. And it was not a stampede or a mass exodus ...
This is the first lie on we have worked: The previous elections were based on inflated census. The census "official" was at least double that almost real (who tell us now that is real). Internal elections and gotten results, they were handled, were not consistent with reality.
At the expense of not know what steps the Commission Unitary IU (the pot of consensus "), has completed its work and censuses IU approved in all associations ... begin discussions in September and elections of delegates to the Ninth Federal Assembly and precisely these surveys will determine the correlation of forces in the territories and between the different currents, parties and sensitivities.
In any democratic process, the census is one of the pillars for the realization of , they can only vote who are in the census. So the guarantee of democracy requires, together with the role of government to materialize, at least two conditions: One, that are public, they are published, which are visible to all, and especially, expressed copies, representatives of applications are presented and even the controllers that ensure the cleanliness of the vote. Another, which has neutral bodies, boards of elections, pluralistic, with authority to resolve conflicts that might arise. right to know, to be rectified to complain, to challenge. Transparency and neutrality.
We followed the approval process at IU census, more democratic force State, and have received singularities, contradictions, and also a reasonable doubt elements that make us skeptical, very skeptical about the veracity of this process and its outcome: made clear, we have very serious doubts about the authenticity of census or the census, approved.
First, be clear, the other parliamentary parties arc likely to have censuses, we will not hesitate, but what we have perceived in their respective congressional processes are many elections by acclamation, many candidates and only a "representation" over to the gallery media that internal democracy ...
But the issue of IU census has been postponed as a commitment unresolved processes emerging in congressional and no one satisfied. In fact, the process of "clarification" of surveys have been requested and resulted from the widespread distrust them. The suspect stated again and again, has been confirmed: censuses were inflated. In fact, in the last Federal Assembly was based on more than 78,000 members in the primaries for the presidential candidate of the Government of 60,000 members, and current data are from just over 48,000. And it was not a stampede or a mass exodus ...
This is the first lie on we have worked: The previous elections were based on inflated census. The census "official" was at least double that almost real (who tell us now that is real). Internal elections and gotten results, they were handled, were not consistent with reality.
0 comments:
Post a Comment